The article shared earlier on our social media handles, brought to light the disturbing link made by Justin Muturi between Safaricom and the controversial arrest of blogger Albert Ojwang.
Muturi, a former top Public Service cabinet secretary, publicly questioned how Ojwang was traced and arrested at his home, later dying in police custody.
In that post, it was noted that Muturi believes Safaricom played a role by allegedly providing sensitive data that aided the security agencies.
The issue has since grown into a national debate, touching on corporate accountability and the right to privacy in Kenya.
That same report quoted Muturi warning that such actions amount to aiding crimes against humanity. He called on Kenyans to hold Safaricom accountable, suggesting legal action or a boycott if necessary.
Many Kenyans responded with shock and anger, asking whether their personal data is safe in the hands of companies trusted with everyday communication.
The fear is that once data is shared without consent or legal clearance, anyone critical of the government could become a target. This fear has created deep mistrust in how mobile companies work with law enforcement.
New details continue to emerge, strengthening the urgency of this conversation. Muturi’s presence at Ojwang’s requiem mass raised eyebrows, where he not only condemned the police but also called out the Kenya Kwanza administration for ignoring rising cases of abuse and extrajudicial killings.
According to multiple reports, Muturi’s criticism is not just about one company but about the entire system that allows such incidents to happen with no accountability. Rights groups are now calling for a full audit of how data access requests are handled and whether proper legal oversight exists.
The Communications Authority of Kenya has also faced pressure, with people demanding to know whether it monitors or approves every request made by security agencies. With more eyes on the case, and with influential voices like Muturi pushing for the truth, Kenyans are demanding transparency.
The silence surrounding Ojwang’s death is no longer acceptable. Whether the arrest was politically motivated or not, the bigger question is how private data can be misused without checks.
Justice for Albert Ojwang must not be delayed. His death is a painful reminder of what happens when powerful systems operate in darkness considering his arrest was ordered by DIG Eliud Lagat. The country needs honest answers, accountability, and reform so no one else becomes a victim in the name of security.
