Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja has once again found himself at the center of political controversy after a planned impeachment by county assembly members was put on hold following interventions by Orange Democratic Movement leader Raila Odinga.
The decision to temporarily suspend the impeachment bid comes amid growing discontent over Sakaja’s performance in office and allegations of mismanagement and corruption.
According to sources, Raila held a closed-door meeting with Sakaja and ODM-allied MCAs, persuading them to pause their impeachment efforts.
Nairobi County ODM Chairperson George Aladwa confirmed that the MCAs had agreed to delay the motion for one month, allowing the Governor time to “adjust his leadership approach” and repair relationships with the assembly.
Aladwa said Sakaja had acknowledged the accusations against him and offered an apology during the meeting.
The grievances raised by the MCAs were substantial. They accused Sakaja of failing to deliver on his campaign promises, delaying bursary disbursements, and stalling the Ward Development Fund, leaving many residents without critical support.
The assembly members also cited neglect of the county’s wards and the failure to prioritize the needs of Nairobians. These issues reflect a deeper concern about Sakaja’s capacity to manage Nairobi’s complex administration and about alleged corruption practices under his leadership.
While Aladwa described the meeting as a move to promote unity and prevent unnecessary political battles, critics argue that the intervention by Raila and the ODM is effectively shielding Sakaja from accountability.
The party appears more concerned with protecting political interests than addressing the ongoing mismanagement and corruption allegations that continue to harm Nairobi residents.
Reports also indicate that a similar meeting was held by senior United Democratic Alliance leadership with its MCA, highlighting a cross-party effort to prevent the impeachment from proceeding.
President William Ruto reportedly cautioned UDA MCAs against supporting the motion, further illustrating how political alliances are being prioritized over the welfare of Nairobians.
With over 70 of the 123 assembly members initially supporting the impeachment, it was clear that dissatisfaction with Sakaja was widespread. The month-long suspension now gives him breathing room, but many question whether this pause will lead to meaningful change or simply serve to protect him from consequences.
Residents and watchdogs are likely to remain critical, viewing the ODM and UDA interventions as a shield that allows Sakaja to continue alleged corrupt practices while avoiding scrutiny.
Nairobians are watching closely, hoping that the focus will shift back to service delivery, accountability, and proper management of county resources.
The temporary halt of the impeachment should not be mistaken for resolution, as the issues surrounding Sakaja’s governance remain unresolved and the concerns of the city’s residents continue to grow.
