Rigathi Gachagua has once again placed himself at the center of political controversy, this time warning Kenyans against rushing to buy affordable housing units in Ongata Rongai.
During a church service at St. Peter’s ACK Cathedral in Rongai, the Democracy for Citizens Party leader said the land where the 2,000 houses are being built does not belong to the state but to the Presbyterian Church of East Africa.
He claimed the government had forcefully grabbed the land and disguised a commercial project as an affordable housing scheme.
The former Deputy President told the congregation that those buying the units risk losing their money because once he returns to power in 2027, his government would repossess the land and hand it back to the church.
He stressed that the houses are not affordable but commercial in nature and that the church would eventually claim ownership, leaving buyers counting losses.
His statement sparked fear among potential buyers who have already registered through the Boma Yangu platform.
For many families who have been saving in the hope of owning a home, his warning introduced a new wave of uncertainty.
Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Photo Courtesy/Citizen Digital
The government has marketed the Rongai project as part of President William Ruto’s plan to provide shelter to low and middle-income earners.
Launched in July 2025, the development was estimated to cost Ksh5.2 billion and would deliver studio apartments as well as one, two, and three-bedroom houses.
Officials promised that schools, water systems, and a sewer line would be set up to support the project, with boreholes planned to ease water shortages.
However, Gachagua dismissed these assurances, claiming the development was built on disputed land and would not benefit residents as advertised.
His remarks go beyond the issue of land. He criticized the government for ignoring the most pressing needs of residents in Ongata Rongai, Kiserian, and Ngong.
He argued that people in these areas are more concerned about water shortages, sanitation, and unreliable electricity than new housing estates.
He insisted that flashy housing projects do not solve the daily struggles of residents and accused the government of ignoring their voices.
The dispute has now taken on political weight. Gachagua’s tough position against the project reflects a wider battle over priorities and governance.
For President Ruto, affordable housing is a flagship policy meant to define his leadership, but doubts over land ownership and the safety of investments could weaken public trust.
For Gachagua, the controversy gives him an opportunity to rally grassroots support and strengthen ties with the church, a powerful institution in Kenyan society.
The clash over Ongata Rongai affordable houses is no longer just about home ownership. It represents a test of political trust and the competing visions of Kenya’s future. Buyers now face a difficult choice between trusting government guarantees or fearing the possibility of eviction if Gachagua’s prediction comes true.
What was meant to be a simple housing project has turned into a battleground of politics, power, and community interests, leaving many Kenyans unsure of whereto stand.
