Home News Prosecution opposes bond for Lumakanda police chief Wycliff Kwendo over severe child abuse and authority abuse charges

Prosecution opposes bond for Lumakanda police chief Wycliff Kwendo over severe child abuse and authority abuse charges

by Bonny
0 comment

The Director of Public Prosecutions has officially charged the Officer Commanding Station in charge of Lumakanda Police Station following allegations of defiling a 14-year-old girl in Lugari Sub-County, Kakamega County.

The legal action brings a senior law enforcement officer into the court process over serious child abuse claims, drawing attention to accountability within the security agencies.

The accused appeared before Senior Resident Magistrate Dorcas Mac’andere to face the charges leveled against him by the state.

During the court proceedings, Prosecution Counsels Ian Makotsi and Prudence Lelei represented the state and strongly argued against releasing the officer on bail or bond.

They maintained that the nature of the offenses required the court to keep the accused in custody while the matter is being processed.

According to the charge sheet presented in court, the officer faces a primary count of defilement under Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006. In addition to the main charge, the prosecution has listed alternative charges, including committing an indecent act with a child contrary to Section 11(1) of the same Act.

He is also charged with abuse of a position of authority under Section 24(2), which addresses situations where individuals in power take advantage of their standing to commit offenses against vulnerable victims.

The court details indicate that the alleged crimes took place between September 24 and September 27, 2026, within Lugari Sub-County. The state emphasized that the victim involved is a 14-year-old child, making the matter particularly grave under the law.

When addressing the magistrate regarding the bail application, the prosecution team pointed out the severity of the charges as a major reason to deny bond.

Also Read  KUSCCO liquidation draws court challenge over safety of members’ funds

They argued that the serious nature of the offenses and the position held by the accused warranted continued detention to ensure the integrity of the judicial process and the protection of those involved.

After listening to the arguments raised by the prosecution regarding the bail application, the magistrate ordered that the accused officer remain in custody. He was remanded until October 1, 2026, when the court is expected to deliver its ruling on the bond terms and determine whether he will be released or remain detained throughout the trial.

You may also like

You cannot copy content of this page