Former Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i has been implicated in a controversial case involving the seizure of sugar in 2018, which was later revealed to have been unfairly condemned due to political interference.
A court has heard that the sugar, imported from Egypt, was initially branded as toxic because of claims of mercury contamination, but subsequent investigations showed it was safe for consumption.
Employees of the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) and the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) testified that political pressure played a key role in the false accusations.
Interior Security Cabinet Secretary Dr Fred Matiang’i. Photo: The Star Source: Facebook
The sugar was said to have been seized to create a market for politically connected cartels, who profited by controlling the sugar trade.
Vivian Moraa, KRA’s Customs Head Verification Officer, stated that when samples were tested, they revealed only minor moisture content issues, contradicting the mercury claims.
She argued that the seizure was politically motivated, aimed at benefiting certain individuals with ties to the ruling elite.
Samuel Onjolo, a KEBS inspection manager, echoed this view, revealing that all sugar consignments were ordered to undergo mercury testing despite having valid Certificates of Conformity (COC), due to public outcry and political pressure.
Former Interior CS Fred Matiangi and PS Karanja Kibicho
He criticized the actions of the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP), which he said deviated from standard procedures due to political influence.
The controversial sugar, which had undergone thorough analysis, was found to be safe, with only a minor deviation in moisture content that did not compromise its quality.
Despite this, government employees, including Ms. Moraa and Mr. Onjolo, along with other officials and the clearing agent, were charged with releasing the consignment into the market without proper clearance.
Matiang’i, who has been named in the ongoing investigation, continues to face scrutiny amid growing political tensions. The case, which revolves around market control and political influence in the sugar industry, has raised questions about fairness and transparency in trade regulations.
As the political landscape shifts, Matiang’i has emerged as one of the presidential hopefuls for the 2027 elections, making the case even more significant. His involvement in the sugar controversy is likely to have implications for his future political ambitions.
The final verdict in the case will be delivered on February 28, 2025.
